Boost Your Bottom Line by Building Cash Reserves, Investing in Income-Producing Assets

This post was originally published on this site

“I think we’ve got to have to temper our thoughts around how much expansion to do or how big of an investment you make in 2022. That working capital number may need to be higher than you anticipated going into this year,” Olson said. “We have to be very conscientious whenever we’re in a financial boom with great markets. Usually, the input side catches up very quickly but doesn’t come down as quickly.”


Van Nurden advises farmers to think carefully about large purchases of land, machinery or other assets. Farmers dislike paying taxes, and in high-income years like this one, it can be tempting to reduce the tax bill by making a large capital purchase and using depreciation strategies.

“It’s OK to make capital upgrades and do some of the things you’ve deferred during the most recent downturn,” she said. “Where people get in trouble is when they make capital purchases that maybe aren’t as necessary.”

If you make a large equipment purchase, for example, and use up most of your bonus and Section 179 depreciation in the first year, you’ve gotten all of the tax benefit, but likely have to continue making principle payments for five to seven years.

“When profits erode and things get tighter, it’s harder to make those payments,” Van Nurden said. “It’s OK to pay taxes. It means you’re making money.”

Olson added that it’s crucial that you understand the purpose of the purchase and its impact on your cash flow for the length of the lending term.

In some cases, that’s easier said than done. Land purchases tend to be emotional, but their bottom-line impact can be large. Typically, bankers can make the case for a land purchase from a loan-to-value standpoint, but it’s up to the farmer to make sure it’s a good fit for the overall operation’s cost structure.

That means evaluating the current debt load and asset base, understanding the financial costs (interest, fees, etc.) that come with carrying the asset and calculating its impact to cash flow on an annual basis.

He suggests ignoring the current boom times in your analysis. Create a forecast using normalized yields and prices and see how a big purchase affects your breakeven. “Did it increase my break-even cost by 50 cents? Now that could be a pretty significant increase in this marketplace today,” Olson said.

“There’s an old saying: Equity isn’t liquidity. Sometimes we try to make that case, and that can put us into an uncomfortable situation when the market does correct itself to where prices will be less than input costs.”


If you do choose to invest, one thing Olson encourages is investing in income-producing assets. “Is there something you can invest in that gives you a better return to your farming operation?” he said.

Farmers invested heavily in grain bins at the outset of the ethanol boom to help them meet plants’ just-in-time needs, to improve efficiency and to capture as much benefit from basis changes as they could.

According to USDA data, farmers built 1.4 billion bushels of on-farm storage from 2007 to 2017. Olson thinks storage expansion and enhancements will continue to be popular investments because they add efficiency to farming operations.

One traditional way farmers have added income-producing assets in the past is to invest in livestock, but current lumber and construction costs might make investing in a hog confinement barn or similar facility less appealing right now.

Another area Olson sees farmers investing in is sustainability projects, whether that’s adding solar panels or adopting new sustainable farming practices. Solar can help a farm cut down on energy costs while potentially generating some returns, depending on agreements with local electric companies. States incentivize solar investments in different ways, with some state regulations making them much more appealing than others.

Olson said he’s also seen growing interest in various carbon credit programs. While some farmers may be encouraged by the idea of a payment for adopting certain practices, he stressed that’s not where the big payoff comes from.

A grower might receive $10-$20 per acre in carbon credits, but while that might be enough to cover the cost of the seed, a more important value may come from the positive impact to soil health.

“Your money is made on improving your soil health, which could ultimately increase yields and decrease your costs,” he said.

Through her experience working with farmers and digging into their FINBIN data, Van Nurden said the most successful farmers create good plans and stick to them.

“Don’t alter your path,” she said. “Use this reprieve to set yourself up for success.”


Editor’s Note:

This is the fifth of a six-part special series. Next in the series: We will explore how to get the best return on your investment if you upgrade to new equipment.

You can read more about price outlook in the first article of this series, “Farm Revenue Driven by Chinese Demand, Drought Concerns” here:….

The series also examined what farmers are doing agronomically to boost their production. See our second story, “Farmers Willing to Spend Money on Crops if Yield Potential, ROI Are Promising” here:….

For more on tactics to manage land expenses, particularly cash rent negotiations, please read the third piece of this series, “Contact Landowner Now to Smooth Way for Rent Negotiations” here:….

The fourth piece in this series “Maximize Profit With Smart Grain Marketing” can be found here:….

To see a Reporter’s Notebook video about the series, check out….

Katie Dehlinger can be reached at

Follower her on Twitter at @KatieD_DTN