© Sodel Vladyslav / Shutterstock.com
Bitcoin has tumbled roughly 25% from its November 2025 peak of $116,410, now trading around $87,300. For the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA:BITO), the damage has been far worse. The fund has plunged approximately 52% year-to-date, falling from $23.74 in early January to $12.16 as of late December. Understanding BITO’s structure helps explain this performance gap.
What BITO Actually Delivers (and What It Costs)
BITO provides Bitcoin exposure through futures contracts rather than holding the cryptocurrency directly. This structure allows the ETF to trade in standard brokerage accounts and qualify for retirement accounts, solving a practical problem for investors who want crypto exposure without setting up digital wallets or navigating exchanges.
The return engine relies on rolling Bitcoin futures contracts, selling expiring contracts and buying new ones each month. When futures prices exceed spot prices (contango), this rolling process bleeds value. BITO’s 0.95% expense ratio adds another cost layer. Together, these structural drags explain why BITO has underperformed Bitcoin by a staggering margin in 2025, even as the cryptocurrency declined only modestly year-to-date.
The Futures Tax: Why BITO Lags Bitcoin
During 2025, Bitcoin remained relatively flat to slightly negative year-to-date, while BITO cratered 52%. This tracking gap stems directly from the futures-based structure. Each time BITO rolls contracts in a contango environment, it effectively buys high and sells low. Volatility amplifies this effect, as December’s wild price swings demonstrated when BITO fell 8.8% while Bitcoin declined just 3.4%.
For long-term holders, this structural headwind compounds relentlessly. Investors aren’t just paying the expense ratio; they’re absorbing the hidden cost of futures market inefficiencies that can easily exceed 10% annually.
The Tradeoffs: Convenience Versus Performance
BITO offers three clear advantages: regulatory familiarity, retirement account eligibility, and no need for crypto custody infrastructure. However, the tradeoffs are substantial:
- Persistent underperformance versus spot Bitcoin due to contango costs
- Amplified volatility during turbulent markets when rolling costs spike
- Tax complexity from monthly distributions that represent return of capital rather than true income
The monthly distributions BITO pays aren’t traditional dividends. They primarily represent the fund returning capital to shareholders as the futures structure erodes value, creating potential tax reporting complications without generating real income.
Investor Considerations for BITO
BITO’s structure creates specific considerations for different investor profiles. Investors comfortable with crypto exchanges or who have access to spot Bitcoin ETFs face a choice between BITO’s futures-based approach and direct Bitcoin exposure. For multi-year holding periods, the compounding effect of contango costs becomes more significant, as the futures structure continuously erodes value even in flat or moderately appreciating Bitcoin markets.
How IBIT Differs From BITO
The iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ:IBIT) provides a different approach. This spot Bitcoin ETF holds actual Bitcoin rather than futures contracts, eliminating the contango drag entirely. With a 0.25% expense ratio compared to BITO’s 0.95%, IBIT costs 70% less annually. The fund has amassed $67.6 billion in assets since launching in January 2024, demonstrating strong institutional adoption.
IBIT tracks Bitcoin’s price movements far more accurately because it owns the underlying asset directly. While BITO bled 52% in 2025 as futures costs compounded, spot Bitcoin ETFs like IBIT tracked the cryptocurrency’s more modest decline with minimal deviation.
BITO serves a narrow niche for investors who need Bitcoin exposure in accounts that don’t yet allow spot crypto ETFs, but the structural costs make it a poor long-term holding even at depressed prices.