“In those circumstances, they don’t intend to comment further at this time,” the firm added.
The four convictions came after an investigation from the Serious Fraud Office into whether traders had been manipulating Libor for profit.
Libor became the focus of allegations of wrongdoing following the financial crisis in 2008 and has now been discontinued, while its European equivalent Euribor is being reformed.
Because the Supreme Court has now ruled in favour of Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo, the four traders’ appeal is likely to be a more straightforward process than for Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo who argued their case for years.
The Serious Fraud Office declined to comment on the appeal from the four traders on Thursday.
However, it said on Wednesday in response to the ruling on Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo’s case that it had “considered this judgement and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial”.
The Libor scandal came to light in 2012, when it was discovered that banks were artificially inflating rates to profit from trading and were also lowering them to mask the troubles they faced following the outbreak of the global financial crisis.
However, in 2023, the BBC uncovered evidence of a much larger, state-led “rigging” of interest rates, under pressure from central banks and governments across the world during the financial crisis.
Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo argued they were wrongly prosecuted for what were normal commercial practices in order to appease public anger towards the banks over the financial crisis.